Endless Negotiations Between Kosovo and Serbia: Normalization, Mutual Recognition, or Status Quo?

Keywords: Dialogue, normalization of relations, mutual recognition, status quo, Kosovo independence

Abstract

The purpose of the research paper is to examine the process of recognizing Kosovo’s independence, which has faced numerous obstacles since its inception. These challenges have divided states into two groups: those that recognize Kosovo and support its sovereignty, and those that do not recognize it and actively oppose its legitimacy. The prospects for a resolution have been limited; however, current expectations are tied to the potential for a comprehensive agreement between Kosovo and Serbia.

The scientific novelty to lies in its focus on the geopolitical dimensions of the issue, shifting the discussion from a theoretical framework to an examination of the political forces influencing global decision-making. This approach highlights the recognition of a state not merely as a legal matter, but also as a crucial aspect of the sovereignty of the states that choose to recognize or deny it.

Conclusions. The dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia commenced in the late 1990s, marked by armed conflict and attempts at political resolutions. Despite continuous negotiations, both parties have sustained enduring disagreements, impeding substantial progress. The unpredictability of the dialogue process has been influenced by power dynamics within the two nations, trust issues, interests, and perceptions, resulting in minimal advancement and short-term political solutions.

The declaration of Kosovo’s independence marked the onset of a new phase, yet its recognition remains incomplete. The dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia assumed a pivotal role after Serbia leveraged non-recognition to further its integration process while upholding relations with Russia. The matter of Kosovo has sparked debates regarding its recognition, with some viewing it as a unique case and others viewing it as a contentious precedent.

The states that have recognized Kosovo demonstrate a deep understanding of the Kosovo-Serbian conflict or are under the influence of NATO and the United States. Conversely, states that have not recognized Kosovo are primarily situated within Russia’s sphere of influence or maintain weaker relations with the United States. Russia has capitalized on this situation to expand its influence and pose a threat to Europe. Russia’s influence has impeded the Europeanization of the Balkans and indicated its intention to obstruct the recognition of Kosovo’s independence.

And there is also a group of countries that, due to their internal political and ethnic issues, have not yet recognized the state of Kosovo, fearing that it could spark separatist sentiments within their own borders.

The recognition of Kosovo as a state remains a significant and ongoing political and strategic battleground between the United States and its allies and the Russian Federation.

References

Abazi, E. (2008). A New Power Play in the Balkans: Kosovo’s Independence. Insight Turkey, 10 (2), 67-79 [in English].

Abazi, E. (2008). Kosovo Independence: An Albanian Perspective. SETA policy brief, 11, 1-5 [in English].

Bashota, B. & Dugolli, B. (2019). Kosovo-Serbia Agreements Between Creative and Destructive Ambiguity. Revista UNISCI, 50, 125-150. DOI: http://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-52 [in English].

Bastian, J. (2021). Kosovo’s Independence and International Repercussions. IEMed, 217-220. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/4a4iPLb [in English].

Berg, E. & Toomla, R. (2009). Forms of Normalisation in the Quest for De Facto Statehood. The International Spectator, 44 (4), 27-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03932720903351104 [in English].

Caspersen, N. (2015). The Pursuit of International Recognition After Kosovo. Global Governance, 21 (3), 393–412. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24526254[in English].

Efird, B., et al. (2000). Negotiating peace in Kosovo. International Interactions, 26 (2), 153-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620008434964 [in English].

Fabry, M. (2012). The contemporary practice of state recognition: Kosovo, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, and their aftermath. Nationalities Papers, 40 (5), 661-676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2012.705266 [in English].

Fawn, R & Nalbandov, R. (2012). The difficulties of knowing the start of war in the information age: Russia, Georgia and the War over South Ossetia, August 2008. European Security, 21 (1), 57-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2012.656601 [in English].

Ferrero-Turrión, R. (2021). The consequences of state non-recognition: the cases of Spain and Kosovo. European Politics and Society, 22 (3), 347-358, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2020.1762958 [in English].

Flint, C. (2022). Introduction to Geopolitics. New-York: Routledge [in English].

Fridl, D. (2009). Kosovo Negotiations: Re-visiting the Role of Mediation. International Negotiation, 14 (1), 71-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157180609X406526 [in English].

Grzybowski, J. (2017). To Be or Not to Be: The Ontological Predicament of State Creation in International Law. European Journal of International Law, 28 (2), 409-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx031 [in English].

Holbrooke, R. (2007, March 13). Russia’s Test in Kosovo. Washington Post [in English].

Huzen, K. B. (2019). Framework for understanding: geopolitics and foreign policy. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/4gObhyQ [in English].

Imeri, D. & Azizi, A. (2023). Structural and non-structural obstacles in the process of recognition of independence of Kosovo: 2008-2021. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 9 (1), 352-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2391358i [in English].

Ingimundarson, V. (2022). ‘Kosovo Precedent’: Russia’s justification of military interventions and territorial revisions in Georgia and Ukraine. Wien: Österreichisches Institut für Internationale Politik (oiip). Retrieved from https://www.lse.ac.uk/ideas/Assets/Documents/updates/2022-SU-Valur-RussKosovo.pdf [in English].

Kelsen, H. (1941). Recognition in International Law. American Journal of International Law, 35 (4), 605-617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2192561 [in English].

Ker-Lindsay, J. & Berg, E. (2018). Introduction: A Conceptual Framework for Engagement with de facto States. Ethnopolitics, 17 (4), 335-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2018.1495362 [in English].

Kumar, R.S. (2008). From Kosovo to Georgia: The US, NATO and Russia. Economic and Political Weekly, 43 (36), 24-25, 27 [in English].

Marko, J. (2008). The new Kosovo constitution in a regional comparative perspective. Review of Central and East European Law, 33, 437-450 [in English].

Mertus, J. (2009). Operation Allied Force: handmaiden of independent Kosovo. International Affairs, 85 (3), 461-476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2009.00808.x [in English].

Meydan, V. (2018). A Paradox of international (non) recognition: the relationship between de facto states and patron states. Uluslararası Ekonomi Siyaset İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 1 (1), 1-7 [in English].

Murati, B. (2017). The Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on Kosovo’s Declaration of Independence. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 13 (1), 72-82 [in English].

Nicholson, R. (2019). States: The effectiveness and recognition norms. In Statehood and the State-Like in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 92-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851219.003.0004 [in English].

Nikitin, B.S. (2010). Kosovo’s Road to Independence. Inquiries Journal/Student Pulse, 2(9). Retrieved from http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/291/kosovos-road-to-independence [in English].

Nurboja, R. (2018). Negotiations between Kosovo and Serbia from Rambouillet to Independence 1999-2008. European Journal of Social Sciences, 1 (2), 54-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26417/ejss.v1i2.p86-94 [in English].

Oeter, S. (2015). The Kosovo case – an unfortunate precedent. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 75, 51-74 [in English].

Pisciotta, B. (2020). Russian revisionism in the Putin era: an overview of post-communist military interventions in Georgia, Ukraine, and Syria. Italian Political Science Review = Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica, 50 (1), 87-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2019.18 [in English].

Radeljic, B. (2017). Russia’s Involvement in the Kosovo Case: Defending Serbian Interests or Securing Its Own Influence in Europe? Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia 6 (2), 273-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/reg.2017.0017 [in English].

Rajic, D. & Hoare A.M. (2022). Serbia and Russia and the Coming Balkan Storm. The Foreign Service Journal. July-September. Retrieved from https://afsa.org/serbia-and-russia-and-coming-balkan-storm [in English].

Rezvani, B. (2020). Russian foreign policy and geopolitics in the Post-Soviet space and the Middle East: Tajikistan, Georgia, Ukraine and Syria, Middle Eastern Studies, 56 (6), 878-899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2020.1775590 [in English].

Riegl, M. & Dobošand, B. (2023). Geopolitics of Secession. In Griffiths, R.D., Pavković, A. & Radan, P. (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Self-Determination and Secession. London: Routledge, 13 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036593-16 [in English].

Riegl, M. & Landovsky, J. (Eds.). (2013). Strategic and Geopolitical Issues in the Contemporary World. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing [in English].

Rotaru, V. & Troncotă, M. (2017). Continuity and change in instrumentalizing ‘The Precedent’. How Russia uses Kosovo to legitimize the annexation of Crimea. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 17 (3), 325-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2017.1348044 [in English].

Roth, B. (2015). The Virtues of Bright Lines: Self-Determination, Secession, and External Intervention. German Law Journal, 16 (3), 384-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200020915 [in English].

Ryngaert, C. & Sobrie, S. (2011). Recognition of States: International Law or Realpolitik? The Practice of Recognition in the Wake of Kosovo, South Ossetia, and Abkhazia. Leiden Journal of International Law, 24 (2), 467-490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156511000100 [in English].

Sloane, R.D. (2022) The Changing Face of Recognition in International Law: A Case Study of Tibet. Emory International Law Review, 16, 107-186. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=943708 [in English].

Steffek, J. (2007). Legitimacy in International Relations: From State Compliance to Citizen Consensus. In: Hurrelmann, A., Schneider, S., Steffek, J. (eds) Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics. Transformations of the State. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 175-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598393_9 [in English].

Talmon, S. (2004). The constitutive versus the declaratory theory of recognition: Tertium non datur? The British Year Book of International Law, 75 (1), 101-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/75.1.101 [in English].

Tansey, O. (2009). Kosovo: Independence and tutelage. Journal of Democracy, 20 (2), 153-166 [in English].

Taylor, Ch. (2021). The politics of recognition. In Campus wars. Routledge, 249-263 [in English].

Tuathail, G. (2008). Russia’s Kosovo: A Critical Geopolitics of the August 2008 War over South Ossetia. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 49 (6), 670-705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.49.6.670 [in English].

Vidmar, J. (2012). Explaining the legal effects of recognition. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 61 (2), 361-387. [in English].

Visoka, G. (2022). Statehood and recognition in world politics: Towards a critical research agenda. Cooperation and Conflict, 57 (2), 133-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367211007876 [in English].

Weller, M. (1999). The Rambouillet Conference on Kosovo, International Affairs, 75 (2), 211-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00069 [in English].

Wille, T. (2024). Bureaucracy and the everyday practices of contested state diplomacy: The paradigmatic case of Kosovo. Review of International Studies, 50 (1), 190-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210522000602 [in English].

Williams, P. (2000). The Norm of Justice and the Negotiation of the Rambouillet/Paris Peace Accords. Leiden Journal of International Law, 13 (1), 207-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156500000145 [in English].

Williams, P.R., Hitchner, R. & Bugajski, J. (2003). Achieving a final status settlement for Kosovo. Center for Strategic & International Studies [in English].

Worster, W.T. (2009). Law, Politics, and the Conception of the State in State Recognition Theory. Boston University International Law Journal, 27 (1), 115-171. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1447887 [in English].

Yannis, A. (2009). The politics and geopolitics of the status of Kosovo: the circle is never round. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 9 (1-2), 161-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850902723470 [in English].

Zamora, C.M. (2021). Independent States: A Perspective from International Relations. Revista Relaciones Internacionales, 94 (2), 13-34. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15359/ri.94/2.1 [in English].

Published
10.01.2025
How to Cite
Imeri, D., & Dugolli, B. (2025). Endless Negotiations Between Kosovo and Serbia: Normalization, Mutual Recognition, or Status Quo?. Eminak: Scientific Quarterly Journal, (4(48), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.33782/eminak2024.4(48).762
Section
Contemporary History