CELAC in International Relations of Latin America (2010-2023)

Keywords: regional integration, CELAC, Latin America and the Caribbean, international organization, China, EU, Russian Federation

Abstract

The purpose of the research paper is to highlight the formation, development, and results of CELAC’s activities, as well as to define its place in international relations at both the regional and global levels.

The scientific novelty is in the comprehensive analysis of the place and role of the regional international organization CELAC, its failures, and successful initiatives. The authors analyze the formation of CELAC as a representative body in relations with key world political actors – China, the EU, and Russia.

Conclusions. CELAC continues to be an important factor in international relations, especially in the context of the desire of Latin American and Caribbean countries to strengthen cooperation and coordination. The establishment of CELAC was one of the vivid manifestations of the ‘left turn’ with its state-nationalist bias and emphasized interest in solving pressing social problems in domestic politics by the state from the top-down and ensuring its independence from global actors, primarily the United States. CELAC is not a replacement for the cooperation and integration groups – Mercosur, CARICOM, ALCA, etc. The desire for CELAC to be an alternative body – especially to the OAS (The Organization of American States) – does not enjoy regional consensus and it would be difficult to achieve with the resources this body currently has at its disposal.

Although in general, CELAC’s activities were ineffective (most of the region’s problems had not been solved, including poverty, corruption, crime, etc.), there were examples of successful implementation of its decisions in 2013-2018. In recent years, we have observed the intensification of CELAC’s international activities, aimed, first of all, at establishing mutually beneficial and partnership relations with the key actors of world politics and economy – the EU, the USA, and China. But Russia’s aggression towards Ukraine, its desire for self-isolation, the sanctions of the Western world, and the condemnation of aggression by the UN – all this pushes the Caribbean countries away from Russia, although it does not completely negate their cooperation.

References

Boothroyd, R. (2011, 6th December). CELAC, Counter-OAS Organisation Inaugurated in Caracas. Venezuelanalysis.com. Retrieved from https://venezuelanalysis.com/news/6668
Borzova, A.Yu., Eremin, A.A., Ivkina, N.V. & Petrovich-Belkin, O.K. (2021). Russia — Latin America Economic Cooperation: Insights from EU — CELAC Sustainable Development Concept. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 21 (4), 785-802. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2021-21-4-785-802
Borzova, A.Yu., Torkunova, J.A. & Agaev, Yu.I. (2018). Kitay-CELAC: novye tendentsii v ekonomicheskom sotrudnichestve [China — CELAC: new trends in the economic cooperation]. Latinskaya Amerika, 7, 32-46. DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0000022-3 [in Russian].
Domínguez, R. & Sanahuja, J.A. (Eds.). (2023). Una asociación renovada. Balance y perspectivas de la Cumbre UE-CELAC y las relaciones euro-latinoamericanas. Madrid: Fundacion Carolina. DOI: 10.33960/issn-e.1885-9119.DT90
Gavrilova, N.V. (Ed.) (2020). Zovnishnia polityka krain Latynskoi Ameryky [Foreign policy of Latin American countries]. Mariupol: MDU [in Ukrainian].
Gavrilova, N. & Konstantinova, J. (2017). Latynoamerykanskyi vektor zovnishnoi polityky Kytaiu: tsili, zavdannia, mekhanizmy realizatsii [The Latin American Vector of Foreign Policy of China: Objectives, Tasks and Implementation Mechanisms]. Visnyk Mariupolskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: Istoriia. Politolohiia, 13-14, 222-229 [in Ukrainian].
Ivanova, A.V. (2016). Politika KNR v Latinskoi Amerike [Chinese Foreign Policy in Latin America]. Aktualnye problemy sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenyi, 8, 41-46 [in Russian].
Katkova, E. & Eremin, A. (2022). Otnosheniya KNR s regionom Latinskoy Ameriki i Karibskogo basseina na sovremennom etape [China’s Relations with Latin America and the Caribbean at the Present Stage]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsyi, 17 (2), 164-188. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2022-02-07 [in Russian].
Kheifets, V.L. & Khadorich, L.V. (2015). Latinskaya Amerika mezhdu OAG i SELAK [Latin America Between OAS and CELAC]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya (MEMO Journal), 4, 90-100. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2015-4-90-100 [in Russian].
Koneva, I.V. (2013). Transatlanticheskie otnosheniya ES – Latinskaya Amerika v kontse 20 – nachale 21 vv. [EU – Latin America Transatlantic Relations in Late 20 – Early 21 Centuries]. Nauchnyi dialog: Istoriya. Sotsiologiya. Ekonomika, 1 (13), 110-125 [in Russian].
Kosmyna, V. (2017). Latynska Ameryka pislia «livoho povorotu»: novi vyklyky [Latin America after ‘Left Turn’: New Challenges]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V.I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: Istorychni nauky, 28 (67), 2, 52-59 [in Ukrainian].
Kosmyna, V.G. (2012). Utvorennia SELAK – novyi etap v istorii latynoamerykanskoi tsyvilizatsii [Formation of CELAC – a new stage in the history of Latin American civilization]. Naukovi pratsi istorychnoho fakultetu Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 33, 244-251 [in Ukrainian].
Main, A. (2011, December 6). CELAC: Speaking for Latin America and the Caribbean. Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR). Retrieved from https://cepr.net/celac-speaking-for-latin-america-and-the-caribbean/
Marczak, J. & Fleck, J. (2023, July 19). An eight-year diplomatic lull is over. So what did EU and Latin American and Caribbean leaders achieve? Atlantic Council. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/47mjtAw
Mikhaylenko, E.B. & Mikhaylenko, V.I. (2018). Evropeiskiy interregionalizm v Latinsko-Karibskoy Amerike [European interregionalism in Latin-Caribbean America]. Tempus et Memoria, 2/176 (13), 6-17 [in Russian].
Oleksenko, R., Villasmil Espinoza, J. & Andriukaitiene, R. (2023). Regional Integration Projects in Venezuela’s Foreign Policy under the Presidency of Nicolas Maduro (2013-2018). Eminak, 1 (41), 255-275. DOI: 10.33782/eminak2023.1(41).636
Oliveira, L.T.G. & Myers, M. (2020). The Tenuous Co-Production of China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Brazil and Latin America. Journal of Contemporary China, 30 (129), 481-499. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2020.1827358
Suleymanov, A.V. (2017). CELAC – novyi mekhanizm dialoga v Latino-Karibskoi Amerike [CELAC – new mechanism of dialogue in Latin America and Caribbean basin]. Latinskaya Amerika, 9, 49-60 [in Russian].
Quevedo-Flores, J.A. (2019). Las Relaciones Unión Europea-América Latina y el Caribe 1999-2019. Veinte Años de Asociación Estratégica Birregional Eurolatinoamericana. Latin American Journal of International Affairs, 9 (3) (octubre-diciembre), 48-74.
Ruano, L. (2018). La Unión Europea y América Latina y el Caribe: une breve historia de la relacion. Revista Mexicana De Política Exterior, 112, 69-87.
Segovia, D. (2013). Latin America and the Caribbean: Between the OAS and CELAC. Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y Del Caribe – European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 95, 97-107.
Tucker, L.L. (2011, December 7). Bolívar, Los Andes del Perú y la libertad de América. América Latina. Retrieved from https://www.alainet.org/es/active/51398
Xiang, Bo (2018, January 23.). 2nd ministerial meeting of China-CELAC Forum opens up new cooperation areas. Xinhuanet. Retrieved from http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-01/23/c_136918217.htm
Vakarchuk, К.V. (2022). Spivrobitnytstvo krain ES z MERKOSUR ta SELAK: rehionalnyi ta hlobalnyi vymir [Cooperation of EU Countries With MERCOSUR and СELAC: Regional and Global Dimension]. Mizhnarodni ta politychni doslidzhennia, 35, 145-156. DOI: 10.18524/2707-5206.2022.35.261821 [in Ukrainian].
Published
13.01.2024
How to Cite
Andriukaitiene, R., & Villasmil Espinoza, J. (2024). CELAC in International Relations of Latin America (2010-2023). Eminak: Scientific Quarterly Journal, (4(44), 282-300. https://doi.org/10.33782/eminak2023.4(44).687
Section
Contemporary History