Roman Brzeski on Reasons for Defeat of Ukrainian Revolution 1917-1921

Keywords: Roman Brzeski, Ukrainian Revolution, independence, Ukrainian liberation struggle

Abstract

The purpose of the research paper is to study the views of the famous figure of the Ukrainian diaspora, historian and publicist Roman Brzeski on the reasons for the defeat of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917-1921.

Scientific novelty. Roman Brzeski’s understanding of the reasons for the defeat of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917-1921 and the impact of that defeat on the further development of Ukraine is shown. The research works of R. Brzeski, memoirs, and theoretical texts that have not yet been the subject of historical analysis are used.

Conclusions. Roman Brzeski was a follower of the ideologues of Ukrainian nationalism Mykola Mikhnovskyi and Dmytro Dontsov. His analysis of the reasons for the defeat of the Ukrainian Revolution and each of the national governments that operated in 1917-1921 – the Ukrainian Central Rada, the Hetmanate of Skoropadskyi, and the Directorate of the Ukrainian People’s Republic – radically contradicted the views of most of the heads of those governments on that problem. The main reason for that was the political antagonism between the independentist R. Brzeski and the majority of that time Ukrainian political establishment.

In his memoirs and historical and publicistic works, R. Brzeski sought to prove that Ukraine had the necessary objective prerequisites for transformation into an independent, successful European state and that the Ukrainian people aspired to it. The tragedy of the Ukrainian Revolution, in his opinion, was that it was led by people who did not think about the future of Ukraine as a European fully sovereign state, independent from Russia in the economic, political, social, and cultural sense. R. Brzeski was convinced that the Russian political class and Russian society would not agree to any concessions to the Ukrainian movement. The categorical rhetoric and accusatory tone of the author’s statements, which were combined with accurate assessments of the causes of events, personalities, and political processes, were a characteristic feature of his reflections.

References

Anderson, B. (2001). Uiavleni spilnoty. Mirkuvannia shchodo pokhodzhennia y poshyrennia natsionalizmu [Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism]. Kyiv: Krytyka [in Ukrainian].

Andriievska, V. (2020). Pohliady Romana Bzheskoho na polityku Ukrainskoi Tsentralnoi Rady [Roman Brzeski’s Views on Politics Ukrainian Central Rada]. Zaporizhzhia Historical Review, 3 (55), 61-69. DOI: 10.26661/zhv-2020-3-55-07 [in Ukrainian].

Andriievska, V. (2021). Krytyka radianskoho ustroiu u publitsystytsi Romana Bzheskoho (1929-1932 rr.) [Criticism of the Soviet system in Roman Brzeski’s journalism (1929-1932)]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats studentiv, aspirantiv, doktorantiv i molodykh vchenykh «Moloda nauka – 2021». Vol. 1. Pp. 53-55 [in Ukrainian].

Andriievska, V. (2022). Pohliady Romana Bzheskoho na polityku hetmana Pavla Skoropadskoho [Roman Brzeski’s Views on Politics Getman Skoropadskiy]. Zaporizhzhia Historical Review, 6 (58), 107-118. DOI: 10.26661/zhv-2022-6-58-10 [in Ukrainian].

Brzheska, N. (1988). Roman Bzheskyi. Bibliohrafiia drukovanykh prats [Roman Brzheski. Bibliography of printed works]. Toronto [in Ukrainian].

Bzheskyi, R. (Paklen Robert) (2008). Bila knyha. Natsionalna i sotsialna polityka sovietiv na sluzhbi moskovskoho imperializmu: na osnovi avtentychnykh uriadovykh sovietskykh danykh [The White Book. National and social policy of the Soviets in service of Moscow imperialism: Based on authentic Soviet government data]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Brzheski, R. (2016). Preliudiia postupu (vistnykovyi dorobok 1924-1934 rokiv) [The theory of progress (herald revisions 1924-1934)]. Kiyv: Tempora [in Ukrainian].

Dashkevych, Ya. (1998). Roman Bzheskyi: zhyttia y istoryko-publitsystychna diialnist [Roman Brzheski: biography, historical and journalistic activity]. Ukrainski problemy, 1, 122-127 [in Ukrainian].

Hromenko, S. (2018). Zabuta peremoha. Krymska operatsiia Petra Bolbochana [Forgotten victory. Crimea Operation of Petro Bolbochan]. Kyiv: K.I.S. [in Ukrainian].

Hrushevskyi, M. (1919). Khto taki ukraintsi i choho vony khochut [Who are Ukrainians and why do they want]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Hrytsak,Ya. (2004). Ukrainska revoliutsiia 1914-1923: novi interpretatsii. Strasti za natsionalizmom. Istorychni esei [Ukrainian Revolution 1914-1923: new interpretations. Passion for nationalism. Historical essays]. Kyiv: Krytyka [in Ukrainian].

Hyrych, I., Protsenko, O. & Turchenko, F. (Eds.). (2015). Mykola Mikhnovskyi. Suspilno-ekonomichni tvory [Mykola Mikhnovskyi. Socio-economic works]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

I.M. (1933). D-r Vol. Levytskyi – Ukrainska derzhavna put. Chast. persha st. 160. tsina 0,90 hr. Lviv, 1933 r. [Dr Vol. Levytskiy – the road of Ukrainian statehood. Part 1, page 160, cost 0,9 hr. Lviv, 1993]. Literaturno-naukovyi vistnyk, 1 (1), 73-74 [in Ukrainian].

Kalynichenko, V. (2023). «I trysta iz krashchykh naikrashchykh pishlo». Mif Krut u tvorchomu dorobku Romana Bzheskoho [“And three hundred of the best of the best left”. The myth of Krut in the works of Roman Brzeski]. In Zbirnyk naukovykh prats studentiv, aspirantiv, doktorantiv i molodykh vchenykh «Moloda nauka – 2023». Vol. 2. Pp. 297-299 [in Ukrainian].

Lysiak-Rudnytskyi, I. (1994). Ukrainska revoliutsiia z perspektyvy sorokarichchia. Istorychni ese [Ukrainian Revolution from the perspective of 40th anniversary. Historical essays]. Volume 2. Kyiv: Osnovy [in Ukrainian].

Mazepa, I. (1950). Ukraina v ohni i buri revoliutsii 1917-1921 [Ukraine in the fire and storm of the revolution 1917-1921]. Vol. 3. Ausburg: Prometei [in Ukrainian].

Mlynovetskyi, R. (1953). Istoriia ukrainskoho narodu (narysy z politychnoi istorii) [History of Ukrainian nation (sketches about political history)]. Miunkhen: Ukrainske naukove vydavnytstvo [in Ukrainian].

Mlynovetskyi, R. (1970). Narysy z istorii ukrainskykh vyzvolnykh zmahan. 1917-1918 rr. (Pro shcho “istoriia movchyt”) [Essays on history of Ukrainian Revolution. 1917-1918. (What does not ‘history talk about’)]. Vol. 1. Toronto: Chuzhyna [in Ukrainian].

Mlynovetskyi, R. (1973). Narysy z istorii ukrainskykh vyzvolnykh zmahan. 1917-1918 rr. (Pro shcho “istoriia movchyt”) [Essays on history of Ukrainian Revolution. 1917-1918. (What does not ‘history talk about’)]. Vol. 2. Toronto: Chuzhyna [in Ukrainian].

Paklen, R. (1979). Osnovy natsionalistychnoho svitohliadu i ukrainski natsionalisty [The Basics of nationalistic worldview and Ukrainian nationalism]. Vol. IV. Toronto: Chuzhyna [in Ukrainian].

Smolii, V. (Ed.) & al. (1997). Ukrainska Tsentralna Rada. Dokumenty i materialy. Vol. 2. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Sysyn, F. (1977). Nestor Machno and the Ukrainian Revolution. The Ukraine. 1917-1921 A Study in Revolution. Cambridge.

Published
13.01.2024
How to Cite
Turchenko, F., & Kalynichenko, V. (2024). Roman Brzeski on Reasons for Defeat of Ukrainian Revolution 1917-1921. Eminak: Scientific Quarterly Journal, (4(44), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.33782/eminak2023.4(44).676
Section
Modern History